Another post in a continuing discussion (joining this post last week) about the future of photography.
Is photography over? Of course not. But a provocative title none the less (appropriated from SFMOMA) suggesting we think more deeply about what photography was, what it now is, and where it’s going. This video here is part 1 of 3 from a great symposium back in April 2010 sponsored by San Francisco Museum of Modern Art featuring Photographer Philip-Lorca diCorcia, Peter Galassi (MOMA), Vince Aletti (New Yorker), Jennifer Blessing (Guggenheim) and others. Interesting, insightful and evocative IMHO.
If you like this, parts 2 and 3 are avail here via I Heart Photography. More video, plus transcripts avail on the SFMOMA site here.
Thanks, We have recently been trying to find info about this topic for a long time and yours is really a best I’ve learned thus far. However, what in regards to the main point here? Think you’re certain concerning the supply?
and by Frank, I mean Ralph.
feel self-righteous about it (and often bragged about it), on 6 Tula you pretend to be dump and blind and actually urge people to prostrate and worship in front of merderer and don’t feel any shame about it.
I do enjoy the way you have framed this situation and it does provide me some fodder for thought. Nevertheless, through what I have personally seen, I really wish as the actual feed-back pile on that individuals keep on issue and in no way get started upon a tirade regarding the news du jour. All the same, thank you for this exceptional point and though I can not really go along with the idea in totality, I value the perspective.
This conversation is continually coming back to mercenaries. I don’t know of anyone trying to make any money off of the KNLA other than a few reporters who have sold their stories to magazines.