Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Happy Friday. Over at Vogue magazine, it seems the retouching crew was a little remiss with Mario Testino’s shot of Kate Moss and her daughter Lila –seems they…er…left off a few of her daughters fingers. Or worse, that her daughters fingers actually fused into her mom’s back.

So, we all know Photoshop happens. They’re in there taking out zits and making people skinnier than they really are, and taking out wrinkles and on and on. Yes, yes, we all “know” this. But is “oops, I just left off a few body parts” excusable? I don’t know where I stand on this. It’s a beautiful shot, but the sophomoric blunder isn’t lost on me.

Do YOU even care, or is it just expected that there will be some mistakes and faux pas along the way, so we should just get on with it anyway….?

(faux pas via Jezebel)

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

89 replies on:
Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. Juli L. says:
    August 20, 2011 at 12:08 pm

    It is a beautiful photo, but no it isn’t excusable. I don’t think I would have noticed it if it wasn’t pointed out, but I would have noticed it if I was the one editing it…at least I sure hope I would’ve. 🙂

  2. Matt Dutile says:
    August 20, 2011 at 11:00 am

    Testino and Moss are both amazing in their own right. Why did this requiring the poor Photoshoping in the first place?

  3. Tim Skipper says:
    August 20, 2011 at 9:38 am

    What bugs me is they will print a huge mistake, but then tear up a photographer’s portfolio for even the smallest infraction. Just saying, don’t seem fair. 🙂

  4. MissyG says:
    August 20, 2011 at 8:51 am

    I think the photo is beautiful and would love to see it without such extreme photoshopping. I am one of “those” people who find pores, flaws etc beautiful in people and wonder why it has become so important to say beautiful is minus these things. I am curious what the photo looks like before it is photoshopped and would like to know if people would still find it beautiful. I not only have a hard time with the message we are sending when a woman is photoshopped to be flawless and thin but what about the message when we do this with children? More and more I am seeing eye colors enhanced and made to be a little more “sparkly” because we are eliminating what are considered flaws. Are children not beautiful? This may not be what you are seeking as a comment but what strikes me is that this photo needed so much work to be published the touch ups started to erase. Maybe that is the new beauty?

  5. Sandy Gennrich says:
    August 20, 2011 at 7:14 am

    I wouldn’t have noticed if it weren’t pointed out to me. But I do think it’s inexcusable. Vogue shouldn’t allow it to happen, and neither should Mario.

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

vibe motion thumbHiggsfield Vibe Motion Is Here: My Honest Review for Creative Pros
Asset 7weavy freepikWeavy vs Freepik Spaces: A Guide to Node-Based AI for Creative Pros
anglesHow To Create New Angles From Any Photo: Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen Image Edit
grok apeHow to Create Video from an Image with Grok AI Video
style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy (style transfer)
kling starting imageKling 3.0 AI Video Is Here: My 100% Honest Review
higgsfield angles uiHiggsfield Angles 2.0 is here: My 100% Honest Review
nano character thumb fishHow to Build Consistent Characters From A Sketch with Nano Banana & Weavy
midjourney base imageDoes JSON Prompting Actually Work? Tested with Nano Banana
Fluffy-Monsters.max-1080×1080.format-webpHow to Use Nano Banana Pro for Free (Without a Watermark)

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.