Whoa. Again, love how opinionated we all are. Over 1000 opinions in 18 hours. Love love it. If you happened to miss yesterday’s post, we asked for your help in choosing between two images during an edit. And, just as in previous A vs. B posts, I promised to follow up with MY preference of images and a discussion about the comparison. So here are my thoughts….(hit ‘continue reading’)
1. Resoundingly, the majority of you preferred image B. Far and away. Key components you cited were composition and mood.
2. Those that preferred A, generally preferrerd the lighting, the color and the arresting nature of the “hot” model.
3. My preference was also for image B.
4. But I lost a $1 gentlemen’s bet to Erik here in the studio because I thought you’d prefer A since it used a flash.
5. I’m glad I was wrong about #4.
Let’s review. If I was to attempt to categorize all the feedback into some very basic, digestible bites (a tall order, but stay with me here…), it would be this: there are generally two paths for likable photographs…images that arrest us and images that welcome us, that are approachable. Sure there are subtleties to each image above–and every image–butthis A vs. B is a classic matchup of these two principles. In fact, it’s one of the reasons we chose these two images for our internal comparo–and to subsequently pitched it to you to help us figure it out.
Now let’s take another glance at the images and see what’s going on here…
This is image A, below:
In this image (A, above). She’s strobed. Intentionally harsh. Arresting. The background is underexposed a stop or two. There’s drama with light, heavy color treatment, drama with the pose…confrontation. There’s tension in the composition. She’s not where we want her in the frame…she’s overlapping with the background people, she’s off the left as opposed to balanced on the right, she’s cropped. Most of this tension is on purpose in-camera and we generally exaggerated this tension with the evocative color palette and heavy contrast. She’s locked in a gaze with you, the viewer. This is an image that is meant to arrest you. Stop you. Make you look more.
In truth, why I bet Erik a buck that this would be your favorite, was because of the light. This is a broad generalization, but I’ve become a bit jaded that the internet likes strobes because they’re gadgets (and the internet likes gadgets), but NOT because the light is of a good quality. I was happy to be wrong here.
For those that chose A as the preferred – it was usually for, what i would consider, all the “right” reasons – color and tension. So kudos for not getting sucked into the internet–lighting for the sake of lighting–fray. I was happy to be wrong.
This is image B, below:
For the above image, B, everything is naturally lit. Ambient light, 5 o’clock. Over-exposed for softness and then contrast added to bring the subject back from faded. Compositionally speaking, this is nice. Balanced. The van and people in the background on the left and the talent, Lindsey, is on gently tucked slight to the right. Classic rule of thirds here. (cut the picture in thirds, top to bottom and left to right…you’ll find most of the “stuff” stacked right on those lines…). Her expression? For one, it’s casual. Approachable. She’s human. Still beautiful. Interesting I think. It’s got more of a snapshot feel, a slice of real life. She’s walking. The tones are warm. Even the blue van has a bunch of yellow in it to warm it up. The natural back light sets her off the background a little. Warms you. Generally speaking, and certainly compared to the other image A, this is welcoming and approachable. While I enjoy artificial light, I’m generally put off by lighting for lighting’s sake. This photograph is not concerned with that. This is a photograph that I like taking at this point in my career. One that feels like a slice of life.
So there you have it. I lose a buck, but am happy to do so. We have a bunch of great discussion–internally and out here on the internet–and hopefully we all took something away. Even if it’s as simple as reminding ourselves that there’s a million ways to shoot a photo, and at least that many opinions about image preferences, but that in the end, we’re usually either trying to make a picture that arrests the viewer or one that invites them in. In either case, if the image is successful, you’ll take a closer look.
I think, even if I still use it a lot, that the “strobist” trend is going to end soon. As I gear my little studio more and more, I tend to use my lights in a more subtle way now. The cool factor of “in your face strobes” use is quickly fading since every newbie is using it these days. It’s a good thing since it forces us to come back to stories and emotions to stand out among the horde of geeky strobist photographers. Expressions over light perfection will always win.
Great comparison/discussion! I am also happy the outcome was in favor for the B image. Time and time again, I see photographers use strobes in outdoor settings without even attempting using the natural lighting. Not even once! It is as if photographers go directly to “Plan B” (artificial light) before even considering “Plan A” (natural light).
I am definitely with you, Chase. I’d think the majority of people would choose the A image because of the infatuation with strobes; but regardless of lighting technique, one should never underestimate the all mighty “rule of thirds”.
I thought both images had their specific qualities, the ‘arresting’ photo perhaps being less versatile when it comes to using it. But I can see it being used for eg. certain fashion ads, where this particular style is frequently used.
Still, I like photo B best. Strobes can be helpful and nice but why use them when you the available light has such a good quality? Nice discussion BTW, it’s always interesting to read what others think of things like this.
Chase!! Oh ye of little faith!! 😉 You know, it can seem like the internet is all about gadgets and artificial lighting, and yes, even in a world where you ‘must’ detail your strobe set-up when posting to a strobist group on Flickr, then that jaded impression you’ve had is understandable…
But photography isn’t about that and I think most who do it know that…. with all the top end gear in the world, the cameras and lenses and lights and triggers and $20 billion parabolic reflectors (might as well be that price for all the hope I have of getting one soon, hah!) we can zap things to hell and we’ll still know if our image is a big pile of squishy smelly stuff… because we know, all of us, when an image has emotion and story and all the things we really appreciate in an image… and when it doesn’t!
I do believe that…. and I’m glad this exercise has restored some of your faith 🙂
But if you do start to feel a little jaded again, hit me up and I’ll bet you $10k – hah! 😉