Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

What the Foap?! How to Sell Your iPhone Photos [But is it Worth It?]

The iPhone application Foap says $10. Actually…$5 after they take their cut. Here’s the rundown…
Foap is a micro stock photography app made exclusively for iPhone photography. You upload your photos for review using their app, and then when/if they’re approved they become available for purchase in their market for editorial or commercial use by third party companies. There’s no end to the number of times a single photo can be sold (at the fixed $10 rate), so there’s a lot of potential to earn money  ($5 per sold photo) if your work is popular enough.

 

So what do you think? Sound like a good deal? Personally, I’m torn about whether or not I like this concept. Photographers get an incredibly easy way to put their photos on the market, buyers get super cheap images, and Foap gets to split the profits. So who wins in this scenario? Have any of you used this or other micro stock photography services with any success?

If this sounds intriguing to you, check out the Foap site for more information, or better yet, take the app for a test drive.

Related Posts

23 replies on:
What the Foap?! How to Sell Your iPhone Photos [But is it Worth It?]

Comments navigation

Previous
  1. Dar says:
    September 23, 2013 at 10:26 am

    I thought it would only be photos shot through the phone. It is obvious that people are using other cameras and uploading to their phone and then to Foap. I don’t like that. It’s an unfair advantage. I’m a professional photographer, so I should be able to upload my pro work then??? Is this ok? I couldn’t find anything on the terms and conditions about this.

  2. Rajesh Jaimini says:
    October 27, 2012 at 7:57 am

    How to earn through Photography?

  3. Christy Harper says:
    August 20, 2012 at 8:41 am

    cool idea, thanks for the tip 🙂

  4. FcojGomez says:
    August 19, 2012 at 3:14 am

    Forget to be identified as a photographer

  5. studioelan says:
    August 7, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    Well, I think this has great potential in the ‘mobile amateur photo-journalist’ area of the photo-market.
    News coverage requires much less paperwork (permits, model releases, etc) than standard commercial work.
    And this (10$) sure is cheaper than sending a pro to a remote place when all the newscaster needs is one vga-resolution shot of a wrecked car, burning building, etc…

Comments navigation

Previous

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

meta ai dockMeta AI: Is it the “free Midjourney”? My in-depth review for creative pros.
style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy
meta ai sref thumbHow To Use Meta AI “Style Reference Seed” (vs Midjourney)
media_1d23add32a0e1f6a2cd07417ca34195c5dcb70f3aIs Photoshop AI actually good? Firefly, generative fill, neural filters and more…
illustrator logoAdobe Illustrator’s hyped AI features: An honest look

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.