Wow. Two new cameras on my blog in one week (here’s the other one). I’ve never been a gear whore and don’t like dedicating too much real estate here to it, but I do like me some of these compact cameras. So here we go – quick like.
Nikon got the aesthetics right, that’s for sure. If it does nothing else, the new Nikon Df is going to make you look like a legit photographer from the 70’s. Even more so perhaps like a photographer shooting film (but you won’t be.)
Specs: Within the tasty leather, chrome, and gunmetal exterior of this Nikon Df hides…
// the legendary sensor from the Nikon D4 – my favorite still camera sensor of all time
// Nikon’s latest + greatest Expeed 3 processor
// Optical viewfinder with 100% field of view (thank god – not having this sucks)
// Full wireless capability [requires WU-1 wireless adaptor].
// We’re still waiting on the side of french fries, but this full-meal of a camera may just satiate even the hungriest of critics.
Yeah, but does it deliver?
Before we can answer that question (because I can’t – haven’t used it), I want to set my expectations. Because they are (were?) high for this little bugger. But when the hype is this big, the goods had better follow. So here’s what it has to do to get my five stars:
1, Ergonomics. I like how all the dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and ISO give you the option of being really hands on with setting your exposure. Shooting this way really increases my connection with what you’re creating with the camera. The Nikon DF looks like it’ll do a nice job of recreating (or perhaps simulating) that experience of “making” pictures like the cameras of old… That feel helps me be connecting to the art just a little bit more–ie slowing down a tad– than some of my other tools in my shed.
2. The size. The size is nice. Or rather, the size is nice compared to a D4 or pro body. Don’t get me wrong, when I’m on a gig I need the pro body to lean on, bang around, pound nails and otherwise be tough and sturdy. With this little guy? I prefer the portability, sorta. It’ll make a great vacation camera for jet setting photographers….unless you also like to capture video of your travels like I do. If you want video you need another camera, or an additional camera, and then the whole compact selling point is thrown out the airplane window with no parachute. So what gives here? I dunno. They made up a nice advertising story about “back to basics” with a “real camera” but rumor has it they couldn’t keep the guts cool enough to shoot video because mechanically that stuff takes up space. Jury is out. I like the purity angle, but it’s 2013…
3. The sensor. It has the same 16.2-megapixel sensor as Nikon’s pro-focused D4, which is the best still sensor of all time. There, I said it. It has ISO range up to 12,800 and expandable to ISO 204,800!! You can basically shoot this thing in the dark – let’s just hope it (or you) can focus in the dark. What good is the sensor if you can’t pull the trigger in focus?
4. Focus. It better be decent. Nikons have historically kicked everyones ass in this department. This better not be a let down. I hope the focus is fast and accurate. (Speaking of fast…we know it’s not fast in frames per second department. 5 ‘n’ change. Not bad. But not fast. Who cares really – that’s not what this camera is for.) We really do want the focus to be fast, however, if it’s to stand out from it’s peers. BTW, how is the manual focus mode? It better kick ass. I’m curious to see if there are any features to assist with this. There’s a lot of marketing around this camera hightlighting its ability to use all the old non-AI lenses, but the cameras from that time had focusing screens built for manual focus. Without tools like focus peaking, a split image screen, or a microprism screen, shooting with manual focus lenses might just be a pain in the ass. Let’s hope they get it right
5. Pro shit. I’m excited to see how “professional” the camera can be. Can I pound nails with this thing? Is it heavy and durable? We use a ton of different cameras for video, but the D4 is my go-to camera for EVERY SINGLE commercial photo shoot we do. Could the DF could come along on our shoots as a good BTS rig? Even in our BTS stuff we expect pro quality That would be nice if this delivered. I will always have a couple D4 backups, but for the solo photographer, the DF could potentially save pro photographers some weight and coin if (and only if) it can produce professional results in a pinch.
All this said, I can’t wait to get my hands on the Df and take it for a rubber-burning test drive. Good pals like McNally are oogling over it, but Joe would have to use a Nikon mobile phone if they had one, so take that with a grain of salt. Anywhooo. Stay tuned for a more meaty pile of feedback when I get my paws on this thing.
The Df is available for pre-order in four options. Check out the goods here:
/// Black body w/lens
/// Silver body w/lens
/// Black body
/// Silver body
I wouldn’t call the EXPEED 3 “latest and greatest” when another camera from the stable has already shipped with EXPEED 4 (the D5300).
So while it seems like a likeable camera, it would have taken 24MP and a higher shutter speed to hold my full attention.
It’s just not future proof enough.
Excuse me Sir,
what are you looking to buy?
A chipset or an excellent (probably the best at the moment) image quality in an excellent body stuff?
So for half the price the Df makes sense. Overall if you don’t need 11fps.
Best regards
A missed opportunity – should have ripped out all the auto modes and also got rid of the auto focus while they were at it. At least it hasn’t got that video crap that all new cameras are supposed to have (I am a photographer – I think in stills – who needs video crap anyway). Anyway, I have to wait to they make a true successor to the FM. Once they do that, I will order at least a couple of bodies for the practice (hopefully with the old D3X chip set – the best).
yeah – if they wanted to make a point – that would have been way cooler. and then make it lmited edition 🙂
Go all the way and buy a film camera…I think FMs are still found on ebay
It looks perfect, but only because there is NO video, will not be buying it. Really sad!
the same sensor of D4??? wow!!!
…Dear Santa:
thats my real interest in it too
This camera has the biggest drawbacks of modern high-end DSLRs (size, weight, and price) with none of the technological conveniences. So what’s the point? Because it looks cool?
I’ll take a Fuji X package any day of the week over this.
One benefit that you may not be thinking of is that all the pros already have natively compatible glass that is going to work with out adapters ect.. This can save money in the long run i guess
You got that right, there are to many drawbacks with this camera to be considered a pro camera at all. Starting with the 39point AF, moving to the manufactured limits of the sensor and processor. 5.5fps really? The D4 gets what? like 11fps? the controls do not allow the photographer to adjust settings with out pulling the camera from the eye and to top it off if you look at Nikons other offerings there is no place where this camera fits in. At 5.5fps it is obviously not for sports or wildlife shooter. The D800 spanks this camera all day long for portraits and landscapes, Heck even the D600 spanks it. So who is this camera aimed at? well the low light ability would be nice for concerts and um… not much else. At $2900 this hipster camera will require you to have deep pockets for a not so pro camera
Sorry, but your Fuji X series will not work like a DSLR. Absolutely not!
AF works slowly, very slowly.
So if you like family life scenes, you should forget your Fuji.
And… also if you like children shooting, animals shooting,…
I’ve got a D700, it works very very good. I’ve got the Fuji Xe1 too… unfortunately.
I hate flash light. The Df like the D4 permit working in low light conditions for a noise/quality ratio unbeatable.
So the Df should interest all Nikonist aware of the nikon quality products. Without the uncovenient of to small camera body.
Each button as logical place, with a retro design and an up to date sensor.
Like Fiat 500, like new Mini cooper, like the new beetle,…
So try it and you will love it.
For sure.
Best regards.
erratum
… has a logical place…
Just like this DF, Fuji X is not build for Sports/Wildlife photography.
But if you think the af is slow even now, i bet you had not handled one before, especially those produced recently (XE2/X100s)?
That said, I’m a canon user.. XD
Exactly, Michael. This thing is huge and the FF will only be an advantage for extreme landscape images that only 3-5% of humanity can discern. If you are printing extremely large images, bite the bullet and get a MF camera. Hate to pop the FF craze being pushed by camera manufacturers.
I used to think to same way. Logically, this line of thinking makes sense. Then I bought a D3, my first full-frame camera. There’s a feel to the out-of-focus areas that I haven’t been able to match with a DX camera. And the shift in the angle of view using each of my lenses if hard to describe, and equally hard to walk away from. After shooting full frame for a few years, I bought a D7000 for the video features. I haven’t been able to shoot it seriously because it’s not full frame. These might seem like petty issues to you, but the feel of my tools matters to me as a craftsman. Rent a full frame camera for a week and tell me if you still feel the same way.