Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Camera Geek Alert – Sony RX1 Hands-On Review

Small cameras with big sensors are clearly an important part of the future. From the shockingly affordable cinema cameras from Blackmagic Designs to my beloved Olympus E-M5, it’s clear to see that camera manufacturers are responding to a demand for compact camera systems. Sony is up there toward the front of the “big sensor/small camera” charge and seem to be pushing the technology forward, with last years Cybershot RX100, and now this years Cybershot RX1, which packs a full-frame 35mm sensor into a camera body that could almost fit in your pocket.  

All that goodness comes at a price though. When the camera was first announced, my studio geeked out a little since we often get advanced or first run versions. Such was the case with the RX-1. Being camera nerdy we dug into the thing as soon as it arrived via pals at BorrowLenses

My first comment? “Interesting form factor.”

Erik’s first comment? “I just can’t see myself dropping nearly $3,000 for a fixed-lens camera, no matter what kinda guts it has.”

Norton’s first comment? “Gotta give this a chance since its got 24 MegaPixels, ISO 100-25600, dedicated focus, iris and macro rings, and 5 fps burst mode”

Fair ’nuff. We were heading into an intense month of work and travel ahead, so Erik carted this thing around for a few weeks (Thanks E)… Initially it arrived just in time for our Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast with Julien Smith and the badass band My Goodness.  During our setup/soundcheck day, between directing duties, we snagged a few of our first shots with the RX1.

James Franco (or Norton. I can't remember) standing in for lighting before the band arrived.

My Goodness

Erik’s Notes. The RX1 feels great in use.  It’s much smaller than I expected it to be, but the sizable lens, with it’s manual focus and aperture controls built-in, give it just the right amount of grip.  The layout of the rest of the controls are great too.  Just about every function I care about has a dedicated button, and I love the exposure compensation dial on the top.  My only problem with the build of the camera is the lack of a viewfinder, which can be purchased separately for a billion dollars.  Quick personal note to camera manufacturers… Stop skimping on built-in viewfinders.  I’d MUCH rather have even a POS viewfinder than the nicest pop-up flash you can make.  The Olympus EM-5 got it right by building the viewfinder into the body and including an add-on flash with the kit.  I use that viewfinder every time I shoot with the camera and I have never once used the flash.  Sorry, back to the RX1…

My thoughts: The fixed 35mm Zeiss Sonnar f/2 lens is pretty dope, though for the price of the camera it would have been nice to seen that lens be able to come off the body.  It’s a tasty beast, but the inability to swap lenses is going to be a big turn off for people. Concession: luckily Sony picked a sweet-spot of a focal length to stick us with.  So while the camera has no zoom, I’ve got legs – the best zoom in the business. So shooting both wide shots and closeups isn’t that big of a problem.

My Goodness

Joel from My Goodness

After the Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast, we tidied up the studio and packed our camera bags for a commercial shoot in Belize.  Since Erik would be shooting video primarily with a main kit consisted of a couple of Canon 5D mkiii’s with a handful of lenses (ie a handful) any other cameras would pretty much only be used for casual snapshots while we weren’t working.  It would be a perfect setting to test the RX1. Erik’s confession: “I still brought my Olympus E-M5 kit.”  Seemed he just couldn’t fully commit to being stuck with one lens in such a beautiful place.  That plain ol’ 35mm lens just couldn’t keep him covered, and here’s a good example:

Blue Hole Belize

Flying over the Great Blue Hole, E had to time my shots just right to get the composition I wanted.  I was focused on hanging out of the helicopter and directing the pilot, so it was catch and catch can for Erik’s personal photos. His gripe: “This shot would have been exactly what I wanted if I could have zoomed out just a little bit.”

Back to Erik for some more details: When the days calmed down and the mood was more casual, the RX1 became a delight to shoot with. The camera is really small and unobtrusive, yet still totally sweet looking.  It’s a great conversation starter, and you feel like a Rockefeller when the inevitable “so how much does that cost?” question rolls around.

Let’s talk about the leaf shutter, which is built into the lens, thus saving space inside the camera body and aiding the RX1 in retaining its slender girlish figure.  It’s also slightly quieter than a butterfly hiccup, and I hate it.  I’m genuinely curious to know if anyone agrees with me that a quiet shutter is super unsatisfying.  I know this is entirely superficial, but I like my camera to make a little noise when I take the shot.  I wanna feel something mechanical move.  It should be a point of praise for the smooth functionality of the camera, and it must be great for those weirdos who want to discreetly take pictures of strangers, but I can’t get behind it.  I want motor-driving to sound like a motor driving.



My overall reaction (chase):
The image quality is all fine and good.  The above image was shot by Erik at ISO 2500 and still looks pretty clean.  It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a relatively spendy camera that doesn’t produce a nice image at high ISO’s, so image quality in new cameras isn’t nearly as much of a concern to me – especially since it’s not my “pro” camera.  I’m much more interested these days in the experience of using a camera.  Is the camera fun to shoot with?  The RX1 is pretty cool, but the lack of a built-in viewfinder (ala Erik’s point earlier) made me miss it. Also like E I found myself reaching for my Olympus E-M5 instead of the RX1 on several occasions.  I will say that I am interested to see what the future holds for this camera line and I hope Sony continues to push the compact camera envelope. We all win when that happens, regardless of camera choice.

Erik’s roundup. So is it worth the nearly $3,000 price tag?  For my money, no, but here’s my recommendation; everyone who’s reading this should go buy it.  Create a huge market for compact full-frame cameras and give Sony the motivation to develop an upgraded version of the RX1 with interchangeable lenses.  Now THAT’S something I’d buy.

ISO 1600 - f/2.0 - 1/100 sec

ISO 800 - f/2.8 - 13 second exposure

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

26 replies on:
Camera Geek Alert – Sony RX1 Hands-On Review

Comments navigation

Next
  1. Ben says:
    June 18, 2013 at 10:19 am

    It seems like the real advantage Sony has is autofocus Zeiss lenses. It seems like they are also limiting their market by not allowing you to buy MORE lenses. I couldn’t live without the viewfinder. Looking at the back of the camera gives a false sense of perspective.

  2. Tom deBruyn says:
    June 18, 2013 at 10:16 am

    I’m curios if you got to test the high speed sync due to the leaf shutter? One of the most attractive features to me is using on location lighting and dampening the sun’s effects during the peak hours.

  3. Brett F. says:
    June 18, 2013 at 10:10 am

    I was having this conversation with a friend the other day who just got his x100s. I know the internet photo rock stars (chase, zack, etc.) love these cameras, but I can’t justify or see spending more than $600-700 on a fixed lens camera like the x100s or $800-900 on the RX1. Not when I can pick up an EOS 6D and a 35mm f/2 IS USM for $110 less based on today’s prices at B&H or Adorama. Then for the price to add on the Zeiss external optical view-finder for the RX1 ($598) I could add a 50mm 1.4 and a decent flash with a bounce head to the 6D.

    Are some of the features on the RX1 the future? I sure hope they are. I would love to find an alternative to Leica since they have become a boutique product instead of a high-end tool. Are they there yet? Not even close… I think I’ll spend that $2600 to fund a project I’ve been wanting to shoot and make it kick ass with the gear I already have, hipster look or not…

    1. Mike says:
      June 18, 2013 at 5:06 pm

      You don’t get it do you?

      1. Brett F. says:
        June 19, 2013 at 5:15 am

        Mike, apparently I don’t and I’m totally content with that.

        1. Verdoux says:
          June 20, 2013 at 5:20 am

          The point is you get a big sensor on a small camera that you can take with you everywhere (unlike the 6D with its accessories).

          1. Brett F. says:
            June 23, 2013 at 7:04 pm

            Carrying a camera the size of the 6D and 35mm f/2 IS has never bothered me. If you don’t think you’ll need an external flash or other accessories you can leave them at home. Therefore its not obtrusive to me going about my daily life. I carried an F5, D1H, D1X, D2H, 1D II, III, etc… 8-10hrs a day, every day of my career as a PJ so I’m used to it. Sure, something the size of a Leica M series camera would be more convenient and slightly less obtrusive, but convenience isn’t worth the price point these cameras are at (my opinion). The only time I leave my 5D series camera at home is when I’m out and about with friends for a night of bar hopping and at that point I bring along my G12 not only for its size, but lower price point incase something happens to it. Would it be great to have an RX1 in the $800-900 range? Yes, but I cant justify investing $2800 ($3400 w/ an external viewfinder) on a tool that limits me to one focal length. Its the same reason I wouldn’t buy a hammer that limits me to hitting on kind of nail.

  4. Ray Spaddy says:
    June 18, 2013 at 9:57 am

    Great post — Love the sample shots. And Norton does look like James Franco.

  5. Peter says:
    June 18, 2013 at 9:45 am

    How about reviewing its video performance?

Comments navigation

Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

20250724_CJLIVE_YouVSTheAI_Micro_Thumb_16x9_v2.5Will Your Work Still Matter When Everyone Else Is Using AI to Create?
A person sitting at a desk, holding their head in frustration, while flames seem to emerge from their head, symbolizing intense mental stress or burnout. The fiery scene contrasts with the calm surroundings of a room filled with books and papers, enhancing the feeling of overwhelming mental exhaustion. The expression on the person's face shows deep concentration or distress, and the bright colors of the flames highlight the inner turmoil they are experiencing.Creative Burnout Destroying Your Passion? (Try These 4 Quick Strategies)
20250611_CJLIVE_ToDoList_Micro_Thumb_16x9_v2.5What If Social Media Was the Best Way to Learn New Creative Skills?
Illustration of a sheep breaking away from the herd, running in the opposite direction across a green field under a blue sky with clouds. The text 'The Chase Jarvis Live Show' is displayed in bold yellow and black on the left side.6 Unexpected Ways to Break Free from the Herd
Chase Jarvis in mid-conversation, gesturing with his hands, wearing a casual maroon t-shirt. The background appears to be an indoor space with wooden beams on the ceiling and soft lighting. On the left side, a bold yellow and black graphic reads "THE CHASE JARVIS LIVE SHOW," with each word stacked in a column. The scene conveys an energetic and engaging atmosphere, with Chase passionately explaining something to the person in front of him.The Secret to Lifelong Creativity (Hint: It Doesn’t End After Your 20s)
a promotional graphic for "The Chase Jarvis LIVE Show." The left side of the image features the text: "WAKE UP CALL: YOU ONLY HAVE 2,000 MONDAYS LEFT" The text is in bold white and yellow font on a dark gray background, with "2,000 MONDAYS LEFT" highlighted in yellow. In the top left corner, there is the show’s logo, with "THE CHASE JARVIS LIVE SHOW" written in black on a yellow background. On the right side of the image is a photo of a smiling woman with blonde hair, wearing a dark jacket over a light-colored top. The image has a yellow border around it, matching the color scheme of the text and logo.You’re Wasting Your Life (Without Even Realizing It)
20250702_CJLIVE_BuildingWhatMatters_Micro_Thumb_16x9_v2.5Stop Drifting Through Life and Start Building What Matters Most
20240812_CJLIVE_AlisonFragale_YT_16x9Game-Changing Tactics to Elevate Your Status
A silhouette of a person standing triumphantly on the edge of a cliff, arms outstretched, against a vibrant and colorful sky. The sky is filled with dramatic clouds in shades of blue, pink, orange, and purple, creating a breathtaking and awe-inspiring scene. The image conveys a sense of freedom, achievement, and connection with nature.Why Playing It Safe Is Riskier Than You Think
20250611_CJLIVE_RoryVaden_Thumb_16x9_v2.5You’ve Been Focused on the Wrong Thing… Here’s What Really Matters

Daily Creative Projects

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.