Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Drop The Digital From Photography

I heard it again yesterday for the billionth time: “Digital Photography”. Isn’t it time we drop the word ‘digital’?

Seems we’ve managed to drop the “electric” from “electric guitar” in common parlance.

We found it easy to drop the word “acrylic” from “acrylic painting” when that came on the scene with oils.

We quickly ditched the “digital” from “digital music” when it took the lead over records and tapes and CDs.

I suppose by-and-large our industry has dropped the word, but given that digital and analog photography are fundamentally the same thing, isn’t it time we implore the rest of the world to assimilate the term “digital photography” back into “photography” as a whole?

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

194 replies on:
Drop The Digital From Photography

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. Valeriy Veduta says:
    November 11, 2010 at 11:37 am

    I agree, Chase.

  2. Aleeya says:
    November 11, 2010 at 9:54 am

    I call what I do SPECTACULAR PHOTOGRAPHY. Though many may disagree. No “film” or “digital” prefix necessary.

  3. Becky says:
    November 11, 2010 at 9:39 am

    Seriously, Chase, come on. Were you bored today or just trying to tweak us film people into defending our mode?
    There is a place for both, the end result is art. If you choose to capture digitally, you have a camera that makes decisions on computations, and you get to make the decisions on how you saw things later.
    If you choose film, there are certain decisions you make before capture and during that affect the outcome-and other than a few things in the print process, (contrast, color cast, dodge and burn) you get what you get.
    The end result is what you are after….. which is the response to what you saw that made you want to take the picture in the first place.
    The need to define one from the other may come from our desire to trust that what we see is what is actually there. And in some cases, it is hard to look at an image without being hit in the face with the technology that was used to enhance it….

    1. Chase says:
      November 11, 2010 at 8:07 pm

      not at all. i LOVE film. I shoot a lot of film with old nikon rangefinders and hassie’s and pen’s.

      this is not a digital versus film thing becky. It’s a vernacular thing.

      why are there books called composing for digital photography?

      why isn’t it composing photographs?

      i want us all under the same roof of photography. let’s chill on the purity of film and let’s evolve the digi nerds into the same fold. when we get together online we call all segment like mad… but when were talking “photo” “graphy” as in “writing with light”, aint’ we all doing the same thing?

      1. Becky says:
        November 12, 2010 at 12:45 am

        You are right-it should be about composing, not the technique.
        Art is art, however you get there…

  4. David Simonton says:
    November 11, 2010 at 9:13 am

    Pressed for time, are we?

  5. Dianne says:
    November 11, 2010 at 8:42 am

    Photography is how I choose to create images. The camera is the tool I begin with. Whether that camera is digital or film is not important. Thank you for shedding some more light on this subject.

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy (style transfer)
weavy style cobraWhat the heck is Weavy (Figma Weave)? The 100% honest review…
higgsfield angles uiHiggsfield Angles 2.0 is here: My 100% Honest Review
anglesHow To Create New Angles From Any Photo: Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen Image Edit
Fluffy-Monsters.max-1080×1080.format-webpHow to Use Nano Banana Pro for Free (Without a Watermark)
Asset 7weavy freepikWeavy vs Freepik Spaces: A Guide to Node-Based AI for Creative Pros
Asset 6weavy comfyWeavy vs ComfyUI: Which Is Better for Creative Pros?
nano upscale thumbHow to Extend an Image with Nano Banana Pro (outpainting)
midjourney guys thumbHow to Use Midjourney and Nano Banana Pro for perfect images
upscaler thumbThe Best AI Image Upscaler for Creative Pros: 2026 Guide

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.