Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Drop The Digital From Photography

I heard it again yesterday for the billionth time: “Digital Photography”. Isn’t it time we drop the word ‘digital’?

Seems we’ve managed to drop the “electric” from “electric guitar” in common parlance.

We found it easy to drop the word “acrylic” from “acrylic painting” when that came on the scene with oils.

We quickly ditched the “digital” from “digital music” when it took the lead over records and tapes and CDs.

I suppose by-and-large our industry has dropped the word, but given that digital and analog photography are fundamentally the same thing, isn’t it time we implore the rest of the world to assimilate the term “digital photography” back into “photography” as a whole?

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

194 replies on:
Drop The Digital From Photography

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. Jochen Abitz says:
    November 10, 2010 at 11:13 am

    At the moment i switched to film and i love it. I often found myself tweaking my digital shots to film look.
    So why should i shoot digital?

    It is the same thing for sure, but for my heart there is a difference..
    And for me it is not in the same pot. I (see) feel a difference.

  2. Stuart Bailey says:
    November 10, 2010 at 11:12 am

    I agree!
    Photography is an art. Lets not pigeonhole it into film photography and digital photograph. It’s just Photography! Grrrrrr!!!

  3. JONO says:
    November 10, 2010 at 11:11 am

    Umm. OK.

  4. Darryl Gregory says:
    November 10, 2010 at 11:11 am

    I agree Chase,
    We need to see if Canon can drop a zero off the price of some of their lenses also, Maybe you can get that started for the rest of us?

    “)

  5. Paul Stanley says:
    November 10, 2010 at 11:09 am

    Yeah seriously, when it comes down to it, its all photography. Yes, physically one is a little different from the other, but in the end they are both ways of taking photos and you still get a photo no matter what!

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

Fluffy-Monsters.max-1080×1080.format-webpHow to Use Nano Banana Pro for Free (Without a Watermark)
google flow uiWhat is Google Flow? My honest review of their AI video editor
comfyuiWhat the heck is ComfyUI? And is it right for creative pros?
grok apeHow to Create Video from an Image with Grok AI Video
kling starting imageKling 3.0 AI Video Is Here: My 100% Honest Review
higgsfield nano bananaNano Banana with No Watermark? Here’s how to remove it.
topaz gigapixel 2Topaz vs Magnific: Which Is A Better AI Image Upscaler?
lora thumbHow To Use LoRAs in Weavy (vs ComfyUI)
style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy (style transfer)
weavy floraWeavy vs Flora: Which is better for creative pros?

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.