UPDATE: The debate continues below on Nikon’s newly released D600. Win or fail?
++++++
Big announcement today at Haus of Gaga Nikon. Another news bomb just got dropped – the much-anticipated Nikon D600 is here. Not unlike the D4 and D800 before it, I’ve known about its imminent arrival for some time. But for the first time in quite some time, the specs on this camera have exceeded some expectations for a lower-numbered not “pro” body. On the other hand, it seems to be sort of “on par” with Canon’s similar price pointed stuff (7D) that was released 2 years ago.
Here’s some highlighted specs:
_24.3MP FX-Format (ie FULL frame) CMOS Sensor
_1080/30 or 720/60 HD Video Capture
_10 or 20 Mbps Video Capture modes
_100-6400 ISO – Expandable to 50-25600
_5.5 fps Continuous Shooting
_39 Wide-Area AF Focus Points
_Stereo Mic & Headphone Inputs
_HDMI out signal
_Wi-Fi Connectivity with Optional Adapter
(To see a range of images of the camera, click thru image tabs atop this page)
There are several curve balls for me that may have been rumored on the tech sites, but that Nikon actually delivered on this time around… The FULL FRAME move was a good one. A 600 series camera – smaller than it’s recent brethren – at full frame and with all the alloy frame and weather sealing of a high end pro body make this a tempting backup body for some pros, despite its small size and relatively cheap price tag of $2099.
Now, the megapixels. There’s a lot of em, but it seems like the right amount, not overkill like the D800. The fact that its sensor is large makes these megapixels a little tastier too.
Also, FINALLY this is geared more toward video…1080p, audio jack, HDMI out, we get 60p slow mo, and … it has variable bit rate.
The best news? I heard this thing is supposed to ship in just 6 days on Sept 19th.
Disappointments? No 1080/60 (ie slow mo video at full resolution). Bummer. The ISO sensitivity (and perhaps quality of that senstivity) has also been held back from what’s possible with other Nikon cameras. That has really shaped up lately to be Nikon’s ace in the hole – something that they’re doing better than anyone else. Also, probably should have put this atop the list of disappointments…where is the innovation? This is a great camera for the price, but Canon 7D and other have had similar specs for nearly 2 years. Hmmmmm.
(and my buddy DH is pissed that it only syncs at 1/200…because he’s a flasher…)
But beyond that… Please note I HAVE NOT touched one of these cameras, and like the D4, D800, NO I didn’t shoot the campaign. I haven’t yet spent time with the camera to tell you any gory details, although I’m assuming I’ll be able to chat more soon.
The look and feel of this camera? Click thru a range of images of the camera via the above tabs.
So.. I (we?) knew this was coming, but rather than me spouting off about having played with it (I can’t), or telling you what your feelings about this system should be (I won’t), let’s hear from you…
Love, hate, indifferent? Insights?
[Reminder that Nikon plays close attention to this blog, so your comments on this post – glowing or otherwise – might help inform Nikon about what your thinking.]Link to all the Nikon D600 details and/or purchase here via B&H.











I really wish Nikon would stop the megapixels war. D800, to many MPs, D600, to many MPs, D4, too many MPs. And who’s the guy that thought it would be a good idea to adopt a card technology that is only in one camera, D4. I liked Geoffrey’s comment about an FM2 that shot digital. Keep it simple stupid, if it ain’t broke don’t fix it.
Th Nikon D400 (D300s replacement) seems to be missing. I am sure there are plenty of D300/D300s owners out there that would like to buy a new camera but have feel left out with the current lineup. Just saying.
Amen, brother! That’s exactly how I feel.
thats what the d9000 is for
If Nikon is reading this, announce the D400 already! I have been waiting for an upgrade for my aging D200. Need that level build, that deep of a buffer and a higher base frame rate. The D600 isn’t it. The D7000 buffer is crippled, and I don’t need 36MB files to clog up my workflow. Give me a D4 like frame rate in a DX body size with pro level build, a battery that lasts like the D7000’s and some true wide angle prime DX lenses and we have a date. The D600 is too much for not enough. Thanks for listening Nikon, and thanks Chase for providing the forum.
I’ve been waiting on a D700 replacement for two years, but there is no D700 replacement!
D800 has too many megapixels for me and the D600 has too many down sides. I feel that Nikon has forced me to go to Canon. Here in the UK the price of a D600 is £2000, but DigitalRev has both the D800 and Cano 5D mkiii for £2150. Why buy a D600?
So many people are saying they ‘ll buy a D700, but I’ve been shooting with one lately and although it was a groundbreaking camera (along with the D3), it was seriously needing an update.
Derek.
The only D700 replacement I’d like to see is one with the D3s chip. The camera just works.
I like this idea. 😀
This really is amazingly legitimate idea as increased contained in the blog page. Value chatting about available.
Looks like a good choice for anyone looking to get the advantages of FF. I’m not sure why you wouldn’t want to toss in another 900 into the pot for D800 though… D800 just seems much higher quality all the way around.