UPDATE: The debate continues below on Nikon’s newly released D600. Win or fail?
++++++
Big announcement today at Haus of Gaga Nikon. Another news bomb just got dropped – the much-anticipated Nikon D600 is here. Not unlike the D4 and D800 before it, I’ve known about its imminent arrival for some time. But for the first time in quite some time, the specs on this camera have exceeded some expectations for a lower-numbered not “pro” body. On the other hand, it seems to be sort of “on par” with Canon’s similar price pointed stuff (7D) that was released 2 years ago.
Here’s some highlighted specs:
_24.3MP FX-Format (ie FULL frame) CMOS Sensor
_1080/30 or 720/60 HD Video Capture
_10 or 20 Mbps Video Capture modes
_100-6400 ISO – Expandable to 50-25600
_5.5 fps Continuous Shooting
_39 Wide-Area AF Focus Points
_Stereo Mic & Headphone Inputs
_HDMI out signal
_Wi-Fi Connectivity with Optional Adapter
(To see a range of images of the camera, click thru image tabs atop this page)
There are several curve balls for me that may have been rumored on the tech sites, but that Nikon actually delivered on this time around… The FULL FRAME move was a good one. A 600 series camera – smaller than it’s recent brethren – at full frame and with all the alloy frame and weather sealing of a high end pro body make this a tempting backup body for some pros, despite its small size and relatively cheap price tag of $2099.
Now, the megapixels. There’s a lot of em, but it seems like the right amount, not overkill like the D800. The fact that its sensor is large makes these megapixels a little tastier too.
Also, FINALLY this is geared more toward video…1080p, audio jack, HDMI out, we get 60p slow mo, and … it has variable bit rate.
The best news? I heard this thing is supposed to ship in just 6 days on Sept 19th.
Disappointments? No 1080/60 (ie slow mo video at full resolution). Bummer. The ISO sensitivity (and perhaps quality of that senstivity) has also been held back from what’s possible with other Nikon cameras. That has really shaped up lately to be Nikon’s ace in the hole – something that they’re doing better than anyone else. Also, probably should have put this atop the list of disappointments…where is the innovation? This is a great camera for the price, but Canon 7D and other have had similar specs for nearly 2 years. Hmmmmm.
(and my buddy DH is pissed that it only syncs at 1/200…because he’s a flasher…)
But beyond that… Please note I HAVE NOT touched one of these cameras, and like the D4, D800, NO I didn’t shoot the campaign. I haven’t yet spent time with the camera to tell you any gory details, although I’m assuming I’ll be able to chat more soon.
The look and feel of this camera? Click thru a range of images of the camera via the above tabs.
So.. I (we?) knew this was coming, but rather than me spouting off about having played with it (I can’t), or telling you what your feelings about this system should be (I won’t), let’s hear from you…
Love, hate, indifferent? Insights?
[Reminder that Nikon plays close attention to this blog, so your comments on this post – glowing or otherwise – might help inform Nikon about what your thinking.]Link to all the Nikon D600 details and/or purchase here via B&H.
OK, I have the D700 (Had the D50 and the D300 before this) and it is so amazing that I have to really be impressed to reinvest. The D4 is way too expensive but otherwise looks to be the big advancement I want. The D800 has the same ISO settings, same focus points, but adds the video. But those crazy megapixels….too many. At first I’m all excited about the D600….could this be the one….the video is lacking the high end frame rate, and the ISO is still the same as what I have…..oh, and the kicker…..less focus points….sigh….I seem to still be happy with what I have……I also carry a Canon SX230 pocket camera with me at all times and can shoot 1080p video that looks great. So I guess I’m still happy with where I am…..until I go D4.
While I was waiting to upgrade to FX, none of d800 or d600 seems to be a real upgrade to d700 IMO. So I ve finally nailed it to getting a bargain set of d700 and d3s. D600 is interesting but it is not what I want and d800 is not what I expected. Both good but not for me atleast.
While I was waiting to upgrade to FX, none of d800 or d600 seems to be a real upgrade to d700 IMO. So I ve finally nailed it to getting a bargain set of d700 and d3s.
I’m thinking of buying this camera, it is the right camera for what I want to do. The only problem: the price is quite high. if we look at the models which Nikon currently sells, there is a too big gap between the Nikon D7000 and the Nikon D600
Have you used the D7000? If the D600 had a Dx sensor it would be worse than the D7000 for still photography. Slower max shutter speed, same autofocus system, slower sync, less fps, etc. The D7000 is above it’s class and this camera seems to fall slightly below it.
DXO says the D600 sensor is behind D800 and D800e.
I wonder if the max shutter speed of 1/4000 + the flash sync speed of 1/200 is limited by hardware or software? I can’t help but think that they limited it artificially to distance it further from the D800..?
Btw., imagine a digital FM2 with the D3s sensor… drool…!