Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Happy Friday. Over at Vogue magazine, it seems the retouching crew was a little remiss with Mario Testino’s shot of Kate Moss and her daughter Lila –seems they…er…left off a few of her daughters fingers. Or worse, that her daughters fingers actually fused into her mom’s back.

So, we all know Photoshop happens. They’re in there taking out zits and making people skinnier than they really are, and taking out wrinkles and on and on. Yes, yes, we all “know” this. But is “oops, I just left off a few body parts” excusable? I don’t know where I stand on this. It’s a beautiful shot, but the sophomoric blunder isn’t lost on me.

Do YOU even care, or is it just expected that there will be some mistakes and faux pas along the way, so we should just get on with it anyway….?

(faux pas via Jezebel)

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

89 replies on:
Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. Thomas says:
    August 19, 2011 at 2:46 pm

    There’s more here 😉
    http://www.photoshopdisasters.com/

  2. Pratap Ramamurthy says:
    August 19, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    Would you like to get more visitors from New York?

    Submit your blog in zeole.com/nyc . This is a one time submission. This would automatically submit a preview of your future blog posts in New York, with a link back to your blog.

    Enjoy more traffic from New York 🙂

  3. Craig Murphy says:
    August 19, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    Maybe they did it just to see if anyone noticed. -)

  4. James says:
    August 19, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Hahaha as a retoucher who has worked on vogue covers, here is my take…

    The photographer and editor have requested a new arm or hand or something dropped on, plus cleanup and balancing. They have then said that the deadline is in two hours but have only agreed to pay one hour of retouching. The retoucher does not work for free and as such has to pack two hours work into one hour of retouching. If you were driving on a freeway and had to double your speed, how long do you think before you would make a mistake.

    The real source of the problem is vogue being a tightarse. If the retoucher had an extra half hour, the mistake would not have slipped through

  5. Amber says:
    August 19, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    Personally, I couldn’t care less. But professionally, as Vogue Magazine, they should be on top of this shit. It’s just sloppy work. I wouldn’t even deliver a photo to my portrait clients like.

    1. Eric says:
      August 19, 2011 at 12:39 pm

      I agree with Amber. Vogue is not a high school newspaper.

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

20251013_CJLIVE_PortfolioTrap_Micro_Thumb_16x9_v2.5Stop Curating. Start Creating.

Daily Creative Projects

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.