Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Happy Friday. Over at Vogue magazine, it seems the retouching crew was a little remiss with Mario Testino’s shot of Kate Moss and her daughter Lila –seems they…er…left off a few of her daughters fingers. Or worse, that her daughters fingers actually fused into her mom’s back.

So, we all know Photoshop happens. They’re in there taking out zits and making people skinnier than they really are, and taking out wrinkles and on and on. Yes, yes, we all “know” this. But is “oops, I just left off a few body parts” excusable? I don’t know where I stand on this. It’s a beautiful shot, but the sophomoric blunder isn’t lost on me.

Do YOU even care, or is it just expected that there will be some mistakes and faux pas along the way, so we should just get on with it anyway….?

(faux pas via Jezebel)

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

89 replies on:
Photoshop of Horrors: Vogue Mag Forgets Body Parts, Do You Care?

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. Sebastian says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:58 am

    I am not very happy with ppl. photoshopping too much for magazin covers or else. But since it looks like we get the retouched pictures everywhere and everytime, I think we can at least expect to get perfectly photoshopped pictures. So in my opinion: It is a bad mistake and really sheds a bad light on Vogue’s photoshop-“artists”.

  2. Trevor Dean Photography says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:58 am

    Photoshop.. Of course we need it (it’s just an extension of dodging and burning in an old darkroom).

    Retouching.. Sometimes sure. Maybe the photographer didn’t use as flattering of light as he could of and there’s a few more pores showing than a fashion magazine would like.

    But a mistake like this that I would literally expect from the work of a 14 year old learning photoshop.. Is totally inexcusable. I mean did they forgot the keyboard shortcut “cmd + z”

    I believe that photoshop, lightroom, aperture, whatever your choice of tool, is absolutely most of the time nesacssary to “finish or finesse” a great image that was shot in camera. I mean really it’s the photographers vision that matters and let’s face it, no matter how sophisticated, a camera is still just a big chunk of metal and silicone that captures light. It is extremely limited. I doubt there were any if not very very few slides that Ansel Adams didn’t spend time dodging and burning to represent his vision they way he saw it.

    I’m just not okay with the fact that vogues retouching team is I’m sure not starving for a paycheque and yet they’re making/not catching a mistake like this! I think society as a whole has come to expect that photoshop will be used, but gives those of who use it to finesse, a bad name when they see something like this.

  3. Leonardo Martínez says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:57 am

    The ones who made the mistake are Testino’s retouchers, Vogue doesn’t edit the photos…

  4. Chad says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:57 am

    Seems like the equivalent of a typo. Stuff happens. Still looks like a pretty nice picture….

  5. Kris Mitchell says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:56 am

    If it wasn’t for the odd photoshop abuse we wouldn’t have fun websites like Photoshop Disasters!
    Seriously, I do basic retouching and am fully aware of how much I have to learn (my focus is taking the pictures, not the retouching) – but there are some people, PROFESSIONAL people, who make me look like a freaking genius!

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

Fluffy-Monsters.max-1080×1080.format-webpHow to Use Nano Banana Pro for Free (Without a Watermark)
style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy (style transfer)
Asset 33seedance logoSeedance AI Video Generator: A Deep Dive for Creative Professionals
weavy style cobraWhat the heck is Weavy (Figma Weave)? The 100% honest review…
anglesHow To Create New Angles From Any Photo: Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen Image Edit
grok apeHow to Create Video from an Image with Grok AI Video
nano banana edit thumbHow To Edit Images In Nano Banana Pro (inpainting)
nano upscale 22How to Upscale An Image in Nano Banana Pro (4K, no watermark)
nano banana bananaNano Banana Prompts: The Professional’s Guide to AI Image Mastery
nano upscale thumbHow to Extend an Image with Nano Banana Pro (outpainting)

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.