A while back I had Grammy Award Winner, Sir Mix-A-lot on chasejarvisLIVE. The guy is smart – dropped some pretty serious knowledge on the show [here’s the re-watch if you missed it].
At the end of the show, I shot the cover for his upcoming album, live, online. Here are the results.
The lead one that shows his face is my fav, but there’s plenty of debate, because the other shot is tough and mysterious. I’ll resist the temptation to make any real case for one or the other, and I’ll let this is a straight up survey – which photo do you like better A (top) or B (bottom)? (please answer in the post, not via other social channels so we don’t have to chase your feedback – thx!)
Here is photo A:
Here is photo B:
Thanks for your input.
||And if you missed it: Here’s the chasejarvisLIVE episode with Mix||
I prefer A as this is MixALots style. b os too dark
i like B better.
it’s less Posed and more intriguing.
i think it can be cropped and zoomed in on top of hat till the bottom part of the wrists for other elements of the cover like the graphics on the CD itself.
this could be iconic.
Definitely B for me. It’s just graphically more pleasing – although the panties are literally in a bunch!
A – I like the open hands, that gives more story for me at least.
A is better pic for inside jacket, B is more interesting and would make a better cover.