A while back I had Grammy Award Winner, Sir Mix-A-lot on chasejarvisLIVE. The guy is smart – dropped some pretty serious knowledge on the show [here’s the re-watch if you missed it].
At the end of the show, I shot the cover for his upcoming album, live, online. Here are the results.
The lead one that shows his face is my fav, but there’s plenty of debate, because the other shot is tough and mysterious. I’ll resist the temptation to make any real case for one or the other, and I’ll let this is a straight up survey – which photo do you like better A (top) or B (bottom)? (please answer in the post, not via other social channels so we don’t have to chase your feedback – thx!)
Here is photo A:
Here is photo B:
Thanks for your input.
||And if you missed it: Here’s the chasejarvisLIVE episode with Mix||
B is the one I would personally go for. The eyes look a lot more mysterious which I think is great for an album artwork.
He looks better in A, she looks better in B
A. He looks like a duck in B.
In digital processing why make it about A or B…I suggest Girl in A, Him in B — all focus on eyes and bootie. Great work as always!
Chase,
I like A better. Why, the focus should be on the entertainer, not the model. In the A photo you have her upper half in shadow which is great and her “butt” is on the same plane as his face so you take in everything on that plan.
With photo B my eye is drawn to her blonde hair since you have lit that area of her as well.
My opinion, your milage may vary!
Thanks for sharing and asking our opinion.
Bruce Peter