If you’ve ever wondered about the failed, resource-sucking drug war (or you thought we were “doing the right thing”), do yourself a favor buy a ticket for this weekend’s theatrical opening here in the USA. Or, if you’re not in one of these locations (or not in the USA), it’s available for streaming/download on iTunes HERE.
From the IFC: “Subversive and satirical, this documentary offers a fresh take on a serious subject. Through investigative reporting and surprising interviews with subjects ranging from Susan Sarandon to Eminem and Russell Simmons, it illustrates step-by-step how to create a drug empire, from dealing on the corner to running a major cartel. Laying bare the inequities in the legal system and the ways that criminalization breeds violence, the film builds a powerful case for radically rethinking drug policy.” This fresh look explores the rise of actual drug dealers and exposes a $400 billion dollar industry that our government [and many governments worldwide] is happy to keep intact.
For detailed theater and show time info, go HERE.
Thanks for spreading the word for Adrian and yours truly. Any word of mouth/posts/social is greatly appreciated. Together we can shed some light on a dark corner of the world.
[You might remember Adrian’s guest appearance on cjLIVE last April. Some great insight into the entertainment industry and what it means to be a creative in Hollywood. Well worth the [re]watch —> HERE]
Thanks for your fascinating article. Other thing is that mesothelioma is generally brought on by the breathing of fibres from asbestos, which is a dangerous material. It can be commonly found among individuals in the building industry who’ve long exposure to asbestos. It is also caused by residing in asbestos insulated buildings for long periods of time, Inherited genes plays a crucial role, and some folks are more vulnerable to the risk compared to others.
“We can’t give any score to Yingluck, as stated in previous points.”
Throughout this grand design of things you get a B+ with regard to effort and hard work. Where you lost me personally was in all the specifics. You know, it is said, the devil is in the details… And it could not be much more true here. Having said that, let me tell you exactly what did give good results. The article (parts of it) can be pretty engaging and that is most likely the reason why I am making the effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, although I can certainly notice a leaps in reason you come up with, I am definitely not confident of just how you seem to connect your ideas which help to make the actual conclusion. For right now I will yield to your position but wish in the foreseeable future you actually link the facts better.
First of all, I reckon the dress as a Akha-Hmong mix…
4.19 am. Soldiers used teargas on red shirt protesters at Dindaeng, Bangkok. News of the crack down started to come in. Supporters of the group, in the chat rooms, talked about the frustration that the media paid little attention to their plight. They said a number of them were injurged and some were dead but that the soldiers took away the bodies. Some women heard crying on the Dstation broadcast, belonging to the Red group, that she saw soldiers killed protesters and urged for retaliation. The Red suporters complained bitterly about media not double checking information from the government and the soldiers that the Red supporters filred tear gas at the soldiers which forced soldiers to use real ammunitions on them. Reuter said the soldiers admitted they did shoot the protesters.