Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Priceless Celebrity Mugshots. Are These Portraits?

Frank Sinatra 1938

Round here we celebrate photographs. While they sometimes tell stories of love and laughter, they also sometimes tell stories of sadness, horror, or otherwise unsavory-ness. These mugshots of some of the most famous rock stars the world has ever known fall somewhere in between. Check out the confluence of stoicism, ego, and genius in this shot of Frank Sinatra (other greats from Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, Sid Vicious, David Bowie, Axl Rose and a dozen others after the jump…]

These images clearly have cultural value. Are these portraits? Where does the mugshot fit along this spectrum?

Jimi Hendrix 1969

Elvis Presley

Jim Morrison

Sid Vicious

David Bowie 1976

Axl Rose

So I ask you again. Are these portraits?

[and if, like me, you can’t get enough of these, head on over to HowToBeARetronaut to see Janis Joplin, Bill Gates, Jane Fonda, Kurt Cobain, Dennis Hopper, Woody Harrelson, and about a dozen others. Thanks FlavorPill for the tip.]

Related Posts

59 replies on:
Priceless Celebrity Mugshots. Are These Portraits?

Comments navigation

Next
  1. DocMaowi says:
    June 14, 2011 at 10:48 am

    clearly there are portraits and I also think they show the respective artists even as real people. thank

    Greetings from the doc 😉
    martin

  2. david says:
    June 14, 2011 at 10:47 am

    i’d say they are technically portraits, and personally i think they are wonderful representations of specific moments of these people’s lives.

  3. Chelsea Fitch says:
    June 14, 2011 at 10:46 am

    You know at first I was going to say no way. But after looking at them more I say yes they are portraits. Portraits are a way to preserve a moment in someone’s life and tell a story about them at that particular moment in time. These tell more of a story than a lot of the portraits I’ve taken and seen. They show the person’s soul good or bad.

  4. Rachel Tatem says:
    June 14, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Yes! These are portraits! Don’t take my word for it look it up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait By definition! Too great… I’m addicted now

  5. Trudy says:
    June 14, 2011 at 10:44 am

    Time is a huge factor with these. Mugshots do not look like these anymore. The aesthetic of the time (as we perceive it since everyone loves vintage now) and possibly them even being film might matter in this case (though film is not “required” to make a good portrait by any means whatsoever). Also, what the viewer brings to the viewing experience matters. Can we most certainly say that their relative fame then and now does not impact how we view the portraits? I would say no. Many current celebrity photographers are quite mediocre but that is ignored because of the fan’s perceived emotional connection to the star matters more than the image itself.

    But I have to say these are nicely made, especially the first one.

Comments navigation

Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

google flow uiWhat is Google Flow? My honest review of their AI video editor
Fluffy-Monsters.max-1080×1080.format-webpHow to Use Nano Banana Pro for Free (Without a Watermark)
nano grain thumbHow To Add Film Grain With Nano Banana Pro (3 methods)
midjourney style thumbHow to Control Midjourney: Style References, Image References, and Moodboards
comfyuiWhat the heck is ComfyUI? And is it right for creative pros?
topaz gigapixel 2Topaz vs Magnific: Which Is A Better AI Image Upscaler?
nano banana bananaNano Banana Prompts: The Professional’s Guide to AI Image Mastery
meta ai dockMeta AI: Is it the “free Midjourney”? My in-depth review for creative pros.
halftone thumbHow to Create Halftone Effects with Nano Banana Pro (The Right Way)
kling starting imageKling 3.0 AI Video Is Here: My 100% Honest Review

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.