Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Purists Beware

I just recently overheard a self-described “purist” photographer ranting on about how we’re all cheaters and that the photographic masters before us lacked our current luxury–even desire–to “customize” (read: manipulate/photoshop) images. It was “…all about the the composition, a beautiful subject, and a properly exposed picture”.

I call horse-pucky.

Above: Avedon’s instructions to his printer.

—
[Via Monoscope.]

Get my every move: Follow Chase Jarvis on Twitter
Get exclusive content: Become a Fan on Facebook

Related Posts

Brené Brown: The Quest For True Belonging
chase jarvis photographer
How To Become A Pro in 5 Simple Steps
Brené Brown: Daring Greatly to Unlock Your Creativity
The Future Is Yours. What’s Holding You Back?
Stamina, Tenacity and Craft with Eugene Mirman
What To Do With What You’ve Got

26 replies on:
Purists Beware

Comments navigation

Next
  1. Eric Baumann says:
    November 16, 2009 at 10:00 am

    i think photoshop is a great tool when used responsibly, however it is also a dangerous tool, one that has been misused very publicly, subsequently- and irreparably-damaging public attitude towards photography/photographers.

  2. Michael G. Manoukian says:
    November 16, 2009 at 9:54 am

    I have to agree with most of you! Retouching in some shape or form has always existed. Those of us who printed in darkroom know retouching well.

    I read through a book on the British Royal family not too long ago (of course I can't remember what its called right now). It had plenty of classic film printing manipulation in it. Not just D&B;, I'm talking removing objects, people, replacing heads, wrinkles and more.

    However, I don't want to seem like a hypocrite, but I disagree with alot of what is going on these days in the media and what is being taught in school. I draw the line when an image has been manipulated so much that it no longer resembles the original. Like any other, retouching is a tool. I gave a brief demo at a college in Montreal and I was shocked to hear a majority of students say at one point "oh I cant fix that in Photoshop later!"

    It should be a tool used to add and enhance not replace good photography!

    Thats are my two cents!

  3. Ben Lawson Photography says:
    November 16, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Dave, those are dodge/burn/retouch instructions. Not that I can interpret them for you… Anyone have a link to the final result?

  4. KAST says:
    November 16, 2009 at 9:36 am

    To assume that the Ansel Adams' or Alfred Eisenstaedts' of the world didn't fret over the nuances of their photos is crazy. What is Adams' Zone System if not a way to "manipulate" the final image.

  5. Darren Newbery says:
    November 16, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Completely agree… http://darrennewbery.com/blog/2009/07/thats-not-real-photography/

Comments navigation

Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts

style xfer thumbHow to Clone Any Image Style With Nano Banana Pro & Weavy (style transfer)
nano upscale 22How to Upscale An Image in Nano Banana Pro (4K, no watermark)
nano character thumb fishHow to Build Characters From A Sketch with Nano Banana & Weavy
anglesHow To Create New Angles From Any Photo: Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen Image Edit
google flow uiWhat is Google Flow? My honest review of their AI video editor
comfyuiWhat the heck is ComfyUI? And is it right for creative pros?
weavy floraWeavy vs Flora: Which is better for creative pros?
meta ai dockMeta AI: Is it the “free Midjourney”? My in-depth review for creative pros.
nano upscale thumbHow to Extend an Image with Nano Banana Pro (with no watermark)
Asset 6weavy comfyWeavy vs ComfyUI: Which Is Better for Creative Pros?

© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.