Remember when I did the original chasejarvisLIVE photo shoot way back in winter? If you recall, I was shooting the album cover image for alt/punk country band Brent Amaker and the Rodeo. We also did post production and editing on the images LIVE as well a few weeks after the shoot. Well now it’s time to print these suckers on a limited edition run of vinyl and there is somewhat of a debate on which image is better.
Simply put, and with no further explanation, I thought I’d ask for your thoughts. So which is better, A or B?
Vote in the comments. Also love to know ‘why’ if you care to explain. 500 px wide images after the jump…
[ also, reminder that if you like music and you like chasejarvisLIVE, I’m hosting rising hip hip star RA Scion (of Common Market and Victor Shade) TODAY in 90 minutes at 10:30 pacific/1:30 eastern (GMT – 8). Interview with RA and Village Voice/Time Out/Stranger cultural critic Charles Mudede, plus RA performs LIVE at the end of the show. Hope to see you http://www.chasejarvis.com/live today….]A. With the foreground lady laying down…
OR.
B. With the foreground lady standing up…
Love to hear your thoughts.
B by far…. on a pure gut feeling.
‘A’ stands out better IMO.
I’d have to go with A over B in regards to a favorite. The model, camera right, is distracting to my eye and I have a hard time getting though her when looking at image B. It would appear that you have applied a vignetting, I’d like to see image A a little lighter in regards to vignetting. BTW, Kick Ass Images!
B is much better… it looks less posed, but still composed.
A is over-produced: “Hey! we’re dramatic! get it?”
Half-baked question, here CJ. Depends where the type goes, fonts used and all things related. One isn’t “better” than the other, as is.