Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis
  • Photos
  • Projects
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book

Drop The Digital From Photography

I heard it again yesterday for the billionth time: “Digital Photography”. Isn’t it time we drop the word ‘digital’?

Seems we’ve managed to drop the “electric” from “electric guitar” in common parlance.

We found it easy to drop the word “acrylic” from “acrylic painting” when that came on the scene with oils.

We quickly ditched the “digital” from “digital music” when it took the lead over records and tapes and CDs.

I suppose by-and-large our industry has dropped the word, but given that digital and analog photography are fundamentally the same thing, isn’t it time we implore the rest of the world to assimilate the term “digital photography” back into “photography” as a whole?

Related Posts

10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
051026_ChaseJarvis_einstein_writing_vlrgwidec
Writing Makes Photographers More Creative — 5 Easy Tips
Daniel Pink: The Power of Regret
Chris Hutchins of Chase Jarvis LIVE
Chris Hutchins: All the Hacks to Maximize Your Life
Chris Burkard on Chase Jarvis LIVE
The Wayward Path of Photographer Chris Burkard
Make Your Message Heard with Victoria Wellman

194 replies on:
Drop The Digital From Photography

Comments navigation

Previous
Next
  1. David Sanger says:
    November 10, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    I also suggest we drop the High Def from HDTV and just call it television

    The other would then become LDTV – Low Def TV

    Why the marketers haven’t figured this yet is beyond me.

  2. A Photog Who Blogs says:
    November 10, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    I still get people asking, “So do you shoot digital?” It’s almost embarrassing and I try not to make them feel bad, but hello!! I usually tell them Kodak stopped making film (or something like that).

  3. Dylan Johnston says:
    November 10, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    Peronally I think the 2 are ever so slightly different, both have +ve and -ve sides:
    Film cameras are cheaper for the same quality now most people have gone digital however with film you still have to pay for the film + processing or chemicals and kit to process and print yourself.
    Digital is quicker to get to a client and easier for them to use in the modern world where as film has a more tradtional feel to it which is often shown in the raw image e.g. film grain and sensor noise, I don’t know what it is but I can tell the difference in a print.
    Smelling of chemicals from the darkroom is great where as stinking of BO from sitting at a computer ain’t to good at all.

    You said about dropping electric from guitar, again I don’t think this has really happened, otherwise you wouldn’t get acoustic sessions would you, well at least they wouldn’t be advertised as acoustic.

    Each to their own, I love shooting film, I love shooting digital but I will be keeping the two seperate for the forseeable future.

  4. Johan says:
    November 10, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    would be nice if the camera manufacturers started off by ditching the “D” in their naming conventions. While their at it ditch the numbers too (since they don’t follow a logical sequence in these anyway) and start naming cameras creatively.

  5. Venura Herath says:
    November 10, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    WORD!!

Comments navigation

Previous
Next

Comments are closed.

BUY NEVER PLAY IT SAFE NOW!

Get weekly, curated access to the best of everything I do.

Popular Posts


© 2024 Chase Jarvis. All rights reserved.